Jack Flash Jr wrote:
deefstes wrote:
dee wrote:On a side note, it must be epic to play in front of so many people...even for a band already as big as U2.
I was thinking the same thing. And imagine the Springbok Nude Girls and Mariam and Amadou. They performed on the same massive stage in front of the same massive crowd and
they didn't even deserve it ?
Woah... steady on there brother...
Of course I'm saying this half tongue in cheek (but only
half tongue in cheek). The fact is, neither SNG or M&A (or both acts together) could ever dream of pulling such a big crowd. They were merely piggy backing on the astronomical success that U2 has achieved over the years. Not a single member of the audience would have decided not to purchase a ticket had either of these outfits not been billed for opening act and not a single member of the audience did purchase a ticket because either of these two outfits have been billed.
U2 pulled those crowds, they deserve to perform in front of such a massive crowd. SNG and M&A were in the right place at the right time.
Aubs1 wrote:
LOL....... I think he was happy that SNG just left, he cound'nt stand the lead guitarist, kept asking me: "Dad, is he ok, I think he's getting a fit!"..hahaha
I'll be honest, I didn't particularly enjoy him either. Obviously I knew he wasn't having a fit (which would have been the only acceptable explanation) so to me he just looked silly.
I am actually somewhat perplexed by the choice of opening acts. I understand that others might like their music so I'm not saying they're bad, I'm just saying that neither of those acts fitted with my taste in music. What perplexes me is the fact that they are so different from the style of music that the main act was about to perform. It's a bit like interrupting an Afrikaans TV program with a Zulu advertisement.
But, like I've said before, both acts drew deafening cheers from the crowds so obviously I'm in the minority.