Levi Clay is great for that sort of stuff ?
=
=
That won't work, literally nothing on the market will do that for you, the springs need to balance. You can lock the trem and tune to your new tuning, but the moment you unlock it everything will get knocked out of whack. You can lock the trem, tune to your new tuning, then tune back to your original tuning and that'll be fine, but what you're asking for is literally unachievable.Norio wrote: Way I figure it, it should be easiest to do this with a Tremol-no: Lock the tremolo, change tuning, unlock the tremolo.
Nick is dead on, but the arming adjusters unfortunately won't help you with changing tuning quickly, if you were to say put your low E down to D it still requires that the springs balance out, in that respect a locked down tremol-no would be best. The Tremol-no will only assist in keeping double stop bends in tune if it is fixed or in drop only mode.Norio wrote: It also sounds like the Arming Adjusters will help with changing the tuning quickly? (Well quick for a floating bridge.)
This is incorrect, there is nothing more complex about making a nylon string than there is about making a steel string, if anything it's easier cause there's no truss rod or radius on the fretboard to consider and the bracing is just bracing, it has a purpose and is arranged in such a way as to fulfill that purpose, there's no voodoo magic going on, or at least nothing that prohibits affordable nylon strings from being acceptable instruments or prevents mass manufacture of a reasonable quality standard.PbZepplin wrote: I think if you are talking about classical guitars, then country of manufacture definitely does matter. The best classical guitars are made in Spain, followed by Brazil. Japan has made some good classical guitars that are fine for everyday practice; however, most classical guitarists rely on Spanish- or Brazil-manufactured classical guitars for performances. I think for classical guitars, the quality of the acoustics of a guitar are of primary importance, and this depends heavily on the quality of woods used and the skill of the luthier. For steel string or electric guitar, the acoustics of the guitar and quality of the wood used are less important, which is why countries such as China have made inroads.
Make your drummer play to a click, then this doesn't happen and all your delays and modulation effects can be tempo synced which will add much more coherency to your overall sound ?G-Man wrote: And it always happens that the songs speed up when performing live, I think drummers should drink chamomile tea and have rescue drops before a show so that the adrenaline doesn't boost up the BPM ?
He's the manager at Feedback, which is a local distribution agency that handles the import of FMIC products ?Guitarstar wrote: Chad Adam Browne - hope you don't mind me asking, what does your boss do when he's not playing guitar ?
Aesthetically I guess they can, but if we were to look at say two options 1 being a tele style and 2 being a les paul, that means that you'd have to buy two seperate pickup modules, 2 seperate bridge modules, 2 seperate body modules, 2 seperate fretboard modules and even then I would have questions like how exactly do they change scale length? How can you switch radius that easily without the action just being shit to start with? How have they attached the neck?domhatch wrote: yeh. so the idea behind a 'modular' guitar - for me at any rate - would be more to emulate a range of different guitars. yes? you'd want something like a les paul, something like a strat, something like a tele, and so on, and you'd want something that can change from the one to the other quickly (so to speak, because you're using this thing in a gigging situation), all in one, neat package that's relatively aesthetically not vomitous.
can these do that? is that the intention?
The Variax has come very close to achieving what it's set out to do, I don't think the technology will ever be common place because guitar players seem to shy away from technologically like it's the plague or something, but the biggest problem with the original Variax was that the tech was cool but the guitar to the majority of people, myself included, felt like shit. The newer Variax models were redesigned by James Tyler and they are much better playing and feeling guitars and the technology has improved so hopefully they're gaining more market traction with that ? and there's also this:domhatch wrote: ps - what was that line 6 guitar emulator; the variax? did anyone ever play one of those? i heard those were pretty ok? what's the difference between that concept and this?
I just think the three I posted are more modular in a purposeful and more useful way, like if you don't like the forearm contour on the Spalt or the Ego you can adjust it's location or get a new piece made to be deeper or shallower etc till you find exactly what you're looking for, I think given the inherent disparities in construction methods the Somniums will never really be anything more than a jack of all trades but master of none. If the Somnium is a 1/4 of the cost of the Birdfish it'll still probably be about $1800 and I'm pretty sure I can find a hell of a lot more guitar in that price range than it will be ?Meron Rigas wrote: Maann, I love the look of the Micheal Spalt guitars. Wizard is also a fan, maybe this means he might try and incorporate some of the design cues into a build someday...
Dunno about the ego or birdfish - like the tech and the innovation. Not the look so much, but the somnium will be about 1/4 of the cost (or less) so apples and oranges to compare them to this three highend beauties.