[EDIT: MJJJ beat me to it, but we're like minded]
Fritz Brand wrote:
Now is it 250W or 500W, as in when the Laney says 300W is it CONTINOUS or PEAK?
It's RMS, which equates to about half of peak and is a much more meaningful spec. when comparing ? The Wharfedale says "Continous RMS", which is meaningless, but from the peak spec, I think they actually mean RMS.
Another thing to note is that the Wharfedales are Bi-Amplified with 250W on the woofer and another 50W on the HF driver, totalling 300W and will be more efficient as well as likely have a better sound quality. All pretty meaninless, because there are so many other factors to take into account like speaker efficiency. Best I can say is they are in the same ballpark power-wise, and that the Wharfedale looks like the better quality.
most places supply their own PA isn't it?