(Log in to disable ads.)

I'm Kinda glad they didn't put that fugly hockey stick head-stock on.. that they still kept it their own..

Ewww.

StephenG but seriously, if you openly admit that your intention was to copy a 63/64 strat, then go all in.. dont do it half-arsed.

+1

      Tuckstir I'm Kinda glad they didn't put that fugly hockey stick head-stock on.. that they still kept it their own..

      Looks like we're the only sane ones left, @Tuckstir ?

        StephenG you take that back or i will poke out your eyes and beat you to death with your ibby headstock.

        You can't beat someone to death with an Ibanez headstock. They're pointy so... unlike Fender... it gets the job done, first time ?

          the other big change to the head-stock besides the shape. is the setback angle.. it has a set back angle unlike fenders flat head-stock that needs string trees.

          and the truss rod cover is nice feature..

          StephenG well if you're talking a guitar duel then I'm in ?

          We haven't done that yet and it could be epic.

          Lower has to record a video saying the winner's favourite headstock is the best headstock there is, was or ever will be ?

          I'm down for a little public humiliation. You?

            NorioDS sorry.. but the stakes are a bit to rich for my blood.. Im out!!

            I was kinda hoping you would back down first and all..

              Poor choice of headstock aside, and price aside, looks like a nice guitar. Now if someone here will please buy one to share with us, so we can come audition it to death, to see if the head does sound bad?

              modulator Poor choice of headstock aside, and price aside, looks like a nice guitar. Now if someone here will please buy one to share with us, so we can come audition it to death, to see if the head does sound bad?

              I'll get one, just to try out.
              My PRS John Mayer signature series silver sky crowd fund is now open.. please dont be shy this is for a good cause

                  I'm a bit disappointed with this "design" by PRS. They could have at least done something more original with the body as well. They could still have done the control positions and the pup/control configuration and electronics the way it is done on a strat, so that the guy can get the tone he wants. But anyone can go buy a Squier and some PRS SE, mutilate it by removing the headstocks and switching them around, to get this.

                  Jigg... the colour as well is blech.

                  NorioDS You can't beat someone to death with an Ibanez headstock. They're pointy so... unlike Fender... it gets the job done, first time ?

                  Being that pointy you could probably stab them to death....

                    Hasie LoL.
                    I am sure Nick didnt expect this thread to get so dark so quick.

                      wern101 I am sure Nick didnt expect this thread to get so dark so quick.

                      I definitely did ⚠ ?

                      Just in case y'all missed the breaking news, Fender fired back at PRS by creating the Carloscaster. And then decided Gibson needed a lesson and made a slashocaster too.

                          7 days later

                          Interesting stream from John Mayer, where he discusses some of the design choices they made with the Silver Sky and why what they produced made the most sense. You might see the guitar a bit differently after this.

                          EDIT: Sorry, if you want to watch it the right way round: http://deturl.com/mirror-flip.asp?v=PFun8pNFriM

                          5 months later

                          Hmm. Looking at the Marshall pics, it seems somebody forgot the back cover as well...
                          Headstock, one cannot do much about, but surely, buyer should be able to decide whether the spring cover needs to come off or not?

                          • V8 replied to this.