[deleted]
Well, the blitzkreig was made possible by methamphetamine, and Hitler took speed five times a day. There, I hope that has concluded this argument.
Well yes. The law would be an ass in such a case, but if it's within the rules it's legal. If no progress in equipment was allowed they'd still be racing penny farthings - and there'd be arguments about the compounds for the tyres and the bearings and the break pads....Fingerpicker wrote:Using the "Unfair advantage" definition he was cheating. I mean his competitor could pull up on a battery powered cycle at the next race, and that would be okay? - even if it's not in the rules.X-rated Bob wrote:
To refer to the example that Fingerpicker gave earlier, aerodynamically efficient handle bars and helmets were not cheating - it was done openly and it was one of those things that the rules had failed to anticipate. Armstrong did what he did secretively and must have known it was against the rules - a different kettle of fish.
I just checked the wiki page. It's interesting. After stage 16 Lemond had that 53 second lead. After 17 Fignon was ahead by 26 seconds. That's a 79 second turn around in one stage. Fignon then extended his lead by another 24 seconds on stage 18 - 103 seconds gained in two stages. For Lemond to make 58 seconds back in the final stage doesn't seem THAT unlikely.From Wiki for interest:
The 1989 Tour de France was the 76th Tour de France, a race of 21 stages and a prologue, over 3285.3 km in total.[1] In the closest tour in his
tory, Greg LeMond was behind by 50 seconds at the start of the final stage, a time trial into Paris. LeMond rode for an average speed of 54.55 km/h (34.093 mph), the second fastest time trial ever ridden in the Tour de France. He made up 58 seconds on Laurent Fignon, to win the race by 8 seconds. LeMond and Fignon occupied the top two places between them from early in the race. The two men were never separated by more than 53 seconds throughout the race.
Viccy wrote: Well, the blitzkreig was made possible by methamphetamine, and Hitler took speed five times a day. There, I hope that has concluded this argument.
I know Hitler invaded France, but I don't think he did the Tour De France ?Viccy wrote: Well, the blitzkreig was made possible by methamphetamine, and Hitler took speed five times a day. There, I hope that has concluded this argument.
I suppose speed is always useful in a raceViccy wrote: Before speed was made illegal some TDF'ers used it.
Haha - Godwin's law again?Viccy wrote: Well, the blitzkreig was made possible by methamphetamine, and Hitler took speed five times a day. There, I hope that has concluded this argument.
He did ...sort of....studmissile wrote:I know Hitler invaded France, but I don't think he did the Tour De France ?Viccy wrote: Well, the blitzkreig was made possible by methamphetamine, and Hitler took speed five times a day. There, I hope that has concluded this argument.
And stole all of Holland's bicycles to do it! :roflmao:Vic wrote:He did ...sort of....studmissile wrote:I know Hitler invaded France, but I don't think he did the Tour De France ?Viccy wrote: Well, the blitzkreig was made possible by methamphetamine, and Hitler took speed five times a day. There, I hope that has concluded this argument.
?
I just checked the wiki page. It's interesting. After stage 16 Lemond had that 53 second lead. After 17 Fignon was ahead by 26 seconds. That's a 79 second turn around in one stage. Fignon then extended his lead by another 24 seconds on stage 18 - 103 seconds gained in two stages. For Lemond to make 58 seconds back in the final stage doesn't seem THAT unlikely.X-rated Bob wrote:
Agreed .....Chabenda wrote: Hmmph...this is how it's done!
http://www.usatoday.com/story/gameon/2013/01/19/ivan-fernandez-anaya-runner-loses-on-purpose/1847999/
He'd do this... ?IceCreamMan wrote:Agreed .....Chabenda wrote: Hmmph...this is how it's done!
http://www.usatoday.com/story/gameon/2013/01/19/ivan-fernandez-anaya-runner-loses-on-purpose/1847999/
What would lance armstrong do?
shock horror ,,,are you saying we not all equal ...in this egalitarian world this is very politically incorrect...... genes more important than upbringing ...Trippp wrote: This all started with that b*tch, Mother Nature. Genetics ensures nobody starts off on equal footing. In horse racing it's the owner/breeder that gets the prize, not the horse. I say give all athletes' winnings to their parents ?