deefstes wroteou just don't get it, do you? If someone dislikes a massively bloated article that oozes profanity and self entitlement, it doesn't make them a boring old grumpy bag bent on religious debate, it simply means they prefer their entertainment in a different format.
You still failed miserably at seeing it as a piece of creative writing infused with decades of experience and tongue-in-cheek banter. I happen to know that this guy has made HUNDREDS of records for thirty years and knows what he's talking about.
deefstes wroteVery few people these days have the appetite for reading long winded articles and if it becomes clear in the first paragraph or two that the primary reason for the length is the huge amounts of unnecessary profanity and the author's blowing of his own bugle, then you don't have to be a boring old grumpy bag or religious scholar not to find it entertaining.
Well, it's pretty sad that "very few people have the appetite", then. I think that it might have something to do with instant gratification or something. I dunno. In any case, you don't have to read it all at once, you know. You can take your time. You can read it on your iphone on the can. Come back to it. There are no rules. [MOD EDIT]
deefstes wroteHe may be brilliant at recording high gain guitar but, judged by the average reception here, he's not particularly good at relating his experiences. That's all.
The average reception is improving, if you haven't noticed. [MOD EDIT]
Cheers ?
