Jack Flash Jr wrote:
I've refrained from commenting on the thread lest I incriminate myself... I strongly believe in gathering experiences of all types in order to get a fully rounded world/reality view. That said, Bob is spot on. The key is maintaining some grace while high/drunk whatever whether you are performing or just in company. At some point the cool factor is swamped by the sad factor. For some people high as a kite works (Jimi) and for some it doesn't...
Sure. Like I said I don't pass judgement about a person's character because they like a little whatever to get them through the gig or whatever. And where do you draw the line? I have seen plenty of players who like to take a drink on stage with them and who I presume had another "loosener" before getting up there. I have a John Martyn DVD which shows him clearly pissed when he walks on and shows him down-downing beers between songs - which isn't what floats my boat (and didn't do his health any good in the long run) but he didn't disgrace himself with sloppy playing.
There are substances that I have a real hatred for. The kind that enslave people. I understand the urge to take your mind on holiday, and I've done a bit of it myself (not for years now), but I remember a friend who got hooked on Mandrax and who was totally ruined as a person. Our friendship bit the dust too - you couldn't allow him into your home because you knew the moment your back was turned he was going to grab the tape deck or a piece of jewellery or something and run off to fence it to buy more drugs. So I hate Mandrax (not the people who take it) and I am not fond of other highly addictive things like Heroin that make slaves of people.
The danger area is where some fan confuses the artist's habit with the art. Apparently there were, at one time, Charlie Parker wannabes who deliberately took junk because they figured that's what you needed to do to play like Charlie Parker. Parker, reportedly, was astonished by all of this, saying that he was enslaved by the drug and that it had nothing to do with the creativity.
I'm also wary of concluding that people had demons or whatever. Hendrix ended up in a very messy situation, but then a lot of the people around him didn't have his best interests at heart. He ended up with demons, but I'm not sure he bought them with him in the first place.
Maybe I'm too far under the spell of Richard Thompson who has been a teetotaller for years, keeps a dry house and even gave up coffee a couple of years ago. None of this seems to have done his creativity any harm (though he seems never to have been a big time substance abuser).