Alan Ratcliffe wrote:
Floyd was all four of them for me. Definitely not without either Gilmour or Waters. The sum was greater than the parts.
I'm with Alan on this one.
BUT I still love Roger solo. He always uses great guitarists (Clapton on
Pros and Cons, Jeff Beck on
Amused to death), and Snowy etc live. The trick is, IMHO, not to expect Floyd when you watch Roger, but to listen to his contemporary interpretation of songs which, for the most part, he created (the memorable riff and solo driven DG numbers aside, of course!!) If you expect Floyd when either plays, you're bound to be disappointed (although I do agree with Riaan that DG's Floyd basically sounds like the real thing). But, I assume the point Alan's making, is that even then,with Roger not there, it just feels like something's missing. But hey, guys, this thread is worthy of its own Forum!! ?