Alan Ratcliffe wrote
Splitting via a pot is very cool (especially if you use a cap to keep it largely hum-cancelling), but like using a no-load pot for "neck-on", it's not as fast as a switch.
I get what Tonerider is saying though - that simplicity of use becomes very important in a playing situation. My own switching setups have become progressively simpler over the years for that very reason - especially as I've started adding in piezo systems and other more complex stuff.
You're quite right Alan - I use the no-load pots mainly for bridge humbuckers in a H-S-S configuration, yet I've rewired my stage Les Paul for master volume (top, closest to hand), master tone (replaces bottom volume) and the two existing tone pots were replaced with no-load 250K log's and act as coil-tap pots.
I suppose it is a personal preference. I never look at my right hand when I play live and it has become instinctive for me to just roll-on and off the no-load pots as required, just like volume or tone - seamless!
Oh yes - there is another reason why I don't like push-pull pots. In earlier times I would often pull the whole knob right off the pot in sheer excitement, it would naturally upset my rhythm and I'd get really p****d off!
Hope I can say this!