singemonkey wrote:
... If that guitar had been badly set up, I would have put it straight back on the wall and gone somewhere else for a Fender.
Yeah exactly.
It's funny, a guitar I played in a shop again and again, when I finally brought it home I realized it didn't suit my style very well. (It had small frets which made sweeping very hard for me - my own stupid mistake.) Then later I bought one mail order and avoided that trap. So the mail order worked out better, but arguably only because of the hands-on experience gained in the first place.
Another one I played in a shop and bought, when I lowered the action to my preference had one semi dead spot. Eventually I got it worked out, but the point is the hands-on test didn't necessarily leave me any better off than if I'd just bought blind.
So on average I wonder if either way is really that much better; both seem viable to me with certain inherent risk probabilities... in the end it's all statistics, just like quantum theory. ?