lindsmuse wrote:
2) The sound is almost ALWAYS a problem. Why can't someone invent something so that all the instruments don't have to be wired to a another source and another - and all these cables causing all these problems ...
The only 100% solution to that is for the artist/s to retain a sound guy who knows what he is doing and is in tune with what the artist wants and travel with their own sound system that they know is properly maintained.
Which is expensive.
An alternative is to retain a sound guy who knows what he is doing and make arrangements so that he has plenty of time to check out the rig at the venue, patch in any special equipment that you have to have, and test everything.
Which is less expensive but still not cheap - and the venue may find such an arrangement inconvenient.
It's not a local problem either. The last few years I've been to some shows in the UK. Sound quality was variable. I think that the organisers don't always pay proper attention to this - even if they have good intentions. When we saw the Ukulele Orchestra of Great Britain they had poor sound. This was a fund raising gig in a church. Maybe the venue was the problem, or maybe the organisers didn't understand the need for a good sound person. The UOGB won through though with their personalities, but quite a bit of instrumental detail was lost in the mix - particularly when solos were being taken.
And I think people understimate the task. I have been impressed by exchanges on this forum with the likes of Neps and Tomcat by what good sound guys know and need to know. I think a lot of people think it's a case of buying some speakers and an amp and some cables and a desk and having somebody add some bass, cut the midrange etc etc.