DonovanB wrote:
production in numbers keeps their costs down so many small manufacturers will cost more than one big one
The cost of an average US worker is substantially more than that of a South African. To me the big gain is not in the large production scale (where a lot is automated) but in the smaller scale, mid end market. Hence my hint about the SA luthier.
DonovanB wrote:
Maybe someone (hint hint) should start a guitar factory here
Yes someone hint hint should. Someone with a good deal of experience building guitars. If someone like that should need any financial backing, CAD drawings or some DFMA advice, let them call me.
DonovanB wrote:
Maybe it will get some attention and the big names will move their factories to SA instead.
Who needs the big names? Paul Reed Smith used to have a smaller shop than a couple of SA luthiers nowadays, stuff could happen here too.
Alan Ratcliffe wrote:
Well even other US guitars have a hard time doing that. Look how long it took John Suhr, and his quality blows the big manufacturers away. Hamer, Heritage, any number of other companies doing better work than Gibson but that are not able to compete.
... which is for the exact same reason that I'm challenging here: the world wide notion that it has to be a Gibson or a Fender. I'm not saying that SA could now come up with a brand like that (no one can at this stage) but what I am saying is that the wheel of local production -> competition -> better pricing -> growing local market -> more local production can only be set in motion by manufacturing.
One example is Mervyn Davis - he does not have to compete with Gibson since he is innovative.