domhatch wrote
X-rated Bob wrote
"Popular" and "possessing musical virtue" are not mutually exclusive. See The Beatles and Motown for a start.
bob, i quite agree with that sentiment. however (and i detest howevering having just agreed with someone), my thoughts are that today's 'pop' music and what was popular in the days of invention, of what you could do to be popular as a music act - the beatles, the who, motown as a movement, etc - are poles apart.
yeah?
Maybe. I don't listen to the radio much, so I don't know what the music stations are pushing as pop. I know that they were playing a track off the latest Laurie Levine album on highveld and that's quite acceptable to me - that's a pretty good album (so now the guys at Highveld can sleep).
I'm also old enough to remember that people in earlier generations than mine usually moaned and complained non stop about the pop music that the next generations listened to, so I'm wary of being too reactionary about things, of becoming just another old curmudgeon who thinks that it was better in his day because that was his day.
But in principle see no reason why contemporary pop can't have musical substance as well.
I'm also, I think, less allergic to hip-hop than the average GFSAer, so....