CostaFonix wrote:
I think thats the way I'll be heading Pete, I have reached a point when I write music that I just sing any garbage simply to get the melody line and the vocal harmonies into the track..
Melody and lyrics do not always evolve simultaneously. Paul McCartney had the melody for "Yesterday" long before the lyrics. The Beatles used to refer to it as "Scrambled Egg" because that was how Macca began the nonsense lyrics he used whilst he was refining the tune.
When Paul simon recorded the Graceland album he had very few finished songs. In most cases the lyrics, and thus the vocals, were laid down some time after the original sessons.
How does all of this help Deefstes and other aspiring songwriters? Well, it means that you don't have to bust your chops getting everything worked out at the same time and you don't have to beat yourself up if it doesn't happen that way. Read enough interviews with songwriters and you will find out that songs start from all sorts of different points. Sometimes the melody comes first and the lyric later. Sometimes the other way around. Sometimes you realise you have THIS melody and THIS lyric written independently but they will work together. Songs may evolve from a single line of lyrics, a chorus that has no verses initially, a riff, a title *. They don't necessarily emerge fully formed and from a single burst of inspiration. For a while Yes "wrote" "songs" by laying down lots of short passages, riffs, whatever they had on tape and seeing what bits could be combined to form cohesive songs that they would then learn. Songs may take years of polishing before they are deemed finished and ready for recording.
* "Satisfaction" started off with just that well known riff. Keith didn't know what to do with it. He played it to Mick. Mick thought that if you built a song around that riff then "I Can't Get No Satisfaction" would be a good title. Then Mick wrote the lyrics to fit the title.