PeachyDragon wrote
Where does that leave younglings like me who didn't even know what a truss-rod was just 13 years ago? ?
Born into this society with their bad setups and their instant gratification lifestyle. ?
No excuse. ?
You have to put it all in context. Actually, if anything, in general, things are far better now: manufacturing tolerances are much higher; decent guitars and amps are readily available and relatively inexpensive; and all but the very cheapest stuff is at the very least playable. We've always had to search for the good'uns unless we had the money for the top of the line stuff. These days there is a luthier on every street corner who can improve a cheapie no end and it is well known what makes a guitar good.
Consider that in the "Golden years" of music in the UK, you would probably only be able to afford your first US made guitar when you made it big and signed a record contract with a hefty advance. Sole requirement for joining a band in the '60s was usually that you owned a guitar, any guitar - they were a complete luxury, beyond the reach of most of people and were seen as a way out of a life of post-war drudgery.
What I have a problem with these days is that some of the iconic, ridiculously expensive guitars do not hold their own, quality-wise against the best of the cheaper instruments, but are still priced like they far outstrip them. I don't mind paying a lot more for a little better quality, but paying more for less really irks me. Fenders in the '70's - mid '80s were truly atrocious, but change of ownership brought a new standard that turned things around. These days Fender have a wide range at different price points and you mostly get pretty much what you pay for. Buy any cheaper model guitar though and
you should expect to invest in having a pro setup. That's part of buying an inexpensive instrument.