Hammeron wrote
I never once suggested that Metal is the ONLY genre with lyrical depth.....
That may not have been your intent, but I think people can be forgiven for seeing your post as a declaration of Metal's primacy in matters of lyrical depth.
I don't listen to Hip Hop, to use as an example- so I wouldn't know, but I have a feeling that it is not particularly well known for lyrical depth and meaning....I might be wrong.
Well you seem to have sailed right past my little tale of being treated to a bit of hip-hop in London last year. None of the expected clichés were present - no shooting cops, no slapping women around, no gratuitous sex, no banal lyrics and choruses of "yo". An articulate, well considered song. Written by Michael Franti. I've done a bit of you-tubing and googling since, and he's an interesting guy who writes potent songs.
I think with HM and with hip-hop it's too easy to get caught up in the clichés. Neither genre is intrinsically dumbed down or intrinsically smart. Both have very strong constraints around style - which can be off-putting or threatening to those on the outside, and which tend to draw attention to clichés. The genres are innocent. It's what you do with the genre. Any genre really.... folk doesn't have to be "Puff The Magic Dragon".
I can't think of any song genre that is ipso faco void of lyrical depth and meaning. You get the dumb and the smart and the cliched in all of them.
It's too easy to fall back on cliches. Metal is all about satanism. Rap is all about gangstas and misogyny. Country is all about your wife leaving you and the dog chewing your slippers. Etc etc etc.
It ain't necessarily so.