inflames wrote:
Jackson is just more metal than Ibanez ?
This is pretty much why I don't play em, I like my guitar to be as versatile as my playing and to look completely unassuming and that's what you get with Ibanez. The moment someone walks in with a Jackson you know it'll either be boring Brootalz chug chug crap or widdly widdly sweep picking, the day I see someone on a Jackson playing some tasty fusion I might change my mind...In this country that probably won't happen though.
Seventhson wrote:
They probably paid him a good amount to make him do that. But I reckon he will still use his Ibanez.
Nah, I think that there's some bad blood between him and Ibanez now. From what I know Ibanez found out about his move about 2 weeks before NAMM and had to get thousands of catalogues reprinted...
BMU wrote:
Puh-lease. Jackson is just a lame Fender franchise.
Well they are owned by Fender, but they pretty much run themselves.
BMU wrote:
Looking forward to seeing the Broderick signature Soloist, amped to see it'll be available in 7-string format. Broderick has great taste in guitar styling.
It's not so pretty...
