inflames wrote
Jackson is just more metal than Ibanez ?
This is pretty much why I don't play em, I like my guitar to be as versatile as my playing and to look completely unassuming and that's what you get with Ibanez. The moment someone walks in with a Jackson you know it'll either be boring Brootalz chug chug crap or widdly widdly sweep picking, the day I see someone on a Jackson playing some tasty fusion I might change my mind...In this country that probably won't happen though.
Seventhson wrote
They probably paid him a good amount to make him do that. But I reckon he will still use his Ibanez.
Nah, I think that there's some bad blood between him and Ibanez now. From what I know Ibanez found out about his move about 2 weeks before NAMM and had to get thousands of catalogues reprinted...
BMU wrote
Puh-lease. Jackson is just a lame Fender franchise.
Well they are owned by Fender, but they pretty much run themselves.
BMU wrote
Looking forward to seeing the Broderick signature Soloist, amped to see it'll be available in 7-string format. Broderick has great taste in guitar styling.
It's not so pretty...
